Introduction
The Delhi High Court on August 8, 2025, dismissed the plea to quash an FIR against Kumar Mangat Pathak, producer of Drishyam 2, in an ongoing investigation concerning alleged fraud in overseas distribution rights. Justice Neena Krishna Bansal observed that the investigation is at a preliminary stage and Pathak’s cooperation negates the need for judicial interference.
Alleged ₹4.3 Crore Fraud in Film Distribution Rights
The FIR registered by Delhi Police’s Economic Offences Wing alleges conspiracy, forgery, and misrepresentation linked to a fraudulent deal for exclusive Chinese-language rights of Drishyam 2 across China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, costing a businessman ₹4.3 crore.
Disputed Deal Involving Middleman
The complainant stated he was approached by Bharat Sevak, falsely claiming to represent Panorama Studios and securing an agreement. Despite claims of transferring ₹15.75 crore, Panorama Studios denied any receipt and asserted Sevak’s authorization had expired.
Legal Defense and Court’s Verdict
The producer’s defense stressed the dispute’s commercial nature and Pathak’s cooperation with authorities. Nonetheless, the Delhi High Court refused to stay proceedings or quash the FIR, allowing the investigation to continue.
Conclusion
This ruling emphasizes the judiciary’s preference to let investigations proceed fully in complex fraud cases involving the film industry and international rights deals.
